Okay, we currently have 6 administrators, of which 3 are bureaucrats. I'm not including Bravenwolf or Road in those, as they're going to be demoted.My proposal for admins is:
Bureaucrats:Tominator777SummerSpongefan20Auron~Guardian
Administrators:Nightmare9188LumoshiRiku KH
Support, Neutral, or
Oppose this proposal.
I'm a bureaucrat on several wikis too. And Tominator777 made me bureaucrat on this wiki not Master Bravenwolf:
22:26, May 11, 2014 Tominator777 (wall | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nightmare9188 from (none) to administrator, bureaucrat, rollback and Chat moderator
Plus, he is not an user who appoints users for good reasons, he even tends to mass-promote.
Also it was me to get him demoted on several wikis and I also started the vote here.
I also would make Auron bureaucrat since he contributed much to this wiki and is a bureaucrat on several other wikis, but demote a bureaucrat who also contributed quite much and didn't do anything wrong isn't necessary.
Mass-promoting isn't good but mass-demoting neither. I think we are already demoting the users who aren't useful for this community anymore. Road Runner1 is globally disabled and Master Bravenwolf is globally blocked for violation of the Terms of Use. So why demoting more users.
I'm a bureaucrat on several wikis too. And Tominator777 made me bureaucrat on this wiki not Master Bravenwolf:
22:26, May 11, 2014 Tominator777 (wall | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nightmare9188 from (none) to administrator, bureaucrat, rollback and Chat moderator
Plus, he is not an user who appoints users for good reasons, he even tends to mass-promote.
Also it was me to get him demoted on several wikis and I also started the vote here.
I also would make Auron bureaucrat since he contributed much to this wiki and is a bureaucrat on several other wikis, but demote a bureaucrat who also contributed quite much and didn't do anything wrong isn't necessary.
Mass-promoting isn't good but mass-demoting neither. I think we are already demoting the users who aren't useful for this community anymore. Road Runner1 is globally disabled and Master Bravenwolf is globally blocked for violation of the Terms of Use. So why demoting more users.
Tom promoted you when this wiki was just starting out, so I understand why he mass-promoted.
I see that Tom promoted Bravenwolf to sysop after his demotion by a staff member, but you promoted him to bureaucrat with no consensus.
We talked about it on chat to give him another chance as sysop and bureaucrat. And that's no reason for a demotion. So let's agree on four bureaucrats: You, Tom, Auron and me. And I meant Master Bravenwolf with mass-promoting. Demoting bureaucrats on a whim isn't a good idea. There have to be serious reasons and a real community need and this I don't see.
We talked about it on chat to give him another chance as sysop and bureaucrat. And that's no reason for a demotion. So let's agree on four bureaucrats: You, Tom, Auron and me.
This sounds reasonable to me.
We talked about it on chat to give him another chance as sysop and bureaucrat. And that's no reason for a demotion. So let's agree on four bureaucrats: You, Tom, Auron and me. And I meant Master Bravenwolf with mass-promoting. Demoting bureaucrats on a whim isn't a good idea. There have to be serious reasons and a real community need and this I don't see.
In that case, I'll be adding to the admins list. Either we have an equal number of admins and crats, or we have more admins.
There can be more admins. If they are inactive they can be easily demoted anytime.
Whell I think it would be safe to Keep Nicko as an admin.
Yes we can keep him. Admins we can have much more than bureaucrats, since we don't need a community concensus to demote them when they are inactive or violated the Terms of Use.
We also can promote Random Pony to admin, he has overall 79 edits with his two accounts and also helped demoting Master Bravenwolf.