Okay, we currently have 6 administrators, of which 3 are bureaucrats. I'm not including Bravenwolf or Road in those, as they're going to be demoted.My proposal for admins is:
Support, Neutral, or
Oppose this proposal.
22:26, May 11, 2014 Tominator777 (wall | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nightmare9188 from (none) to administrator, bureaucrat, rollback and Chat moderator
Plus, he is not an user who appoints users for good reasons, he even tends to mass-promote.
Also it was me to get him demoted on several wikis and I also started the vote here.
I also would make Auron bureaucrat since he contributed much to this wiki and is a bureaucrat on several other wikis, but demote a bureaucrat who also contributed quite much and didn't do anything wrong isn't necessary.
Tom promoted you when this wiki was just starting out, so I understand why he mass-promoted.
I see that Tom promoted Bravenwolf to sysop after his demotion by a staff member, but you promoted him to bureaucrat with no consensus.
We talked about it on chat to give him another chance as sysop and bureaucrat. And that's no reason for a demotion. So let's agree on four bureaucrats: You, Tom, Auron and me. And I meant Master Bravenwolf with mass-promoting. Demoting bureaucrats on a whim isn't a good idea. There have to be serious reasons and a real community need and this I don't see.
This sounds reasonable to me.
In that case, I'll be adding to the admins list. Either we have an equal number of admins and crats, or we have more admins.
Whell I think it would be safe to Keep Nicko as an admin.
We also can promote Random Pony to admin, he has overall 79 edits with his two accounts and also helped demoting Master Bravenwolf.
You mean Spongey? I guess that would work.